Welcome to neoToolbox.com! Your home for professional tools and scripts for use with eSignal. If you need any custom eSignal scripts (EFS) built, feel free to contact us.

Disclaimer: By downloading and using any of our studies or visiting our blog, you agree to the following disclaimer:  
 
Past performance is not necessarily indicative of future results. The risk of loss in trading commodities can be substantial. You should therefore carefully consider whether such trading is suitable for you in light of your financial condition. All blog posts are merely a collection of thoughts and opinions and are not buy and sell recommendations. neoTOOLBOX.com does not guarantee results, information, or EFS studies and scripts in any shape or form.

2011.07.14 Trend lines

14. July 2011
I tend to see people make trend lines fit too perfectly, which takes away valuable information from the chart.  

One technique that I use, that I haven't seen anyone else use, is very similar to the "geometric method" but without forcing everything to fit.  In other words, let the breaking of that trend line tell you something.


In a down trend, I extend a trend line from two high pivots (A and B on the chart).  I then copy that line to the lowest price between those two points (point C).  Most people would extend it from point D, I'd imagine, since it would fit better.  However, as all the blue arrows indicate, the line extended from point C worked out better as a trend line/resistance line.

(This isn't the best example, since point E occurred, breaking the high of point A.  There wasn't a very good pullback after point E to make a very good drawing.  But, this is live data from today, so I take what I can get. ;) )

However, what is valuable is the fall after point E broke below the bottom trend line, which is an unsustainable rate of falling.  This tells you the market wants to pullback to one of the two trend lines, which it did.


The same thing happened in the above chart.  I drew the line from A to B, then copied it to the lowest price between those two points, point C.  The market fell below the lower trend line (point D), indicating exhaustion, then a return to one of the trend lines.

Of course, there isn't any explicit trade setups using this method of trend line drawing, but the subject of this thread was more of "liars or not".  I say "not". ;)  However, if you are going with the trend and are shorting a pullback, I would feel more strongly if my setup happened at one of these trend lines, than between.  OR, if you are looking for a counter-trend setup, it helps if that bottom trend line was broken, because it could help a counter-trend pop to happen (as in the second chart).

As an aside, I am a strong believer in tick-based charts when drawing trend lines.  In these charts I am using a 1597T chart on the ES.  What that means is that if there is high volume, more bars are drawn, low volume, less bars are drawn.  During low-volume times, such as the overnight session, it paints the chart in a much easier to understand way compared to time-based charts (5-min, 15min, etc), IMHO.


Above is a ES, weekly chart.  Same thing, but a long case.  Connected A to B, copied to the highest price between A and B at point C.  After breaking above the top line, we traded in an unsustainable rate, leading to exhaustion, leading to a return to norm (point D).  Also, note point E was nice resistance.

Good luck traders!
 
 

Lesson

2011.05.28 1st Trading Day of the Month Strategy

28. May 2011
The first trading day of the month can offer some great opportunities.  Historically, the first trading day of the month is typically an "up" day.  Going back to 1982, the market goes up approximately 70% of the time the first day of the month, for an average of over 9 points.  When it does go down (~30% of the time), it's only by an average of ~7 points.
 
Thus, a strategy idea is to BUY on the close of the last trading day of the month or the open of the first trading day of the month.  Then, exit on the close of that day.  If the first of the month falls on a Wednesday, there is an even greater win percentage!  
 
This year (2011), the last trading day in May is Tuesday the 31st, which puts June 1st on a Wednesday.  
 
As an aside, February and August tend fo favor the downside, so be careful with this strategy during those months. 
 
Good hunting traders!

Lesson

2011.05.13 A Pivot Point Analogy

13. May 2011

I personally love trading pivot points.  They are a great leading indicator (you know exactly where they are at the previous day's close).  How I like to think of pivot levels is like a rubberband.  

If you hold a rubberband between two fingers, this resting state would be the PP.  As the market moves to S1 or R1, this rubberband gets pulled back.  The market wants to return to center, it wants to return to the PP, tension is formed, which is why these levels often act as sup/res in the direction back to the PP.

However, sometimes, when the market gets momentum and starts hitting S3, S4, S5, etc. the rubberband flat out breaks and there is no longer any pull back to center. 

Its important to be aware of when this rubberband breaks and to go with the trend!

Lesson

2011.03.08 A different way of using Fibonacci Retracements (part 2)

8. March 2011

ES 60 min -  Last night, the ES hit resistance and had a sizeable pullback (about 10 points).  Using the normal fibonacci retracement method you would select the high and the low and look for a retracement.  Below is that chart.  Notice the movement didn't quite hit the 52.8% pullback.

 
If you use the method described in part 1 and make the fibs "fit" within the past movement as much as possible (see red arrows), the pullback to the 52.8% level was much more exact (blue arrow).  If all these major turning points were very exact within these fib lines, one would think that future touches to these and other fib levels would also be much more exact, right?  For example, the support at the 0.236 level happening right now.
 
 
We apologize if these images are hard to see.   We are working on a solution.

Lesson

2011.03.07 Fibonacci Level Breakdown and a Case for 52.8%

7. March 2011

There are a lot of articles about the "Golden Mean" or the "Golden Ratio" found in nature and in the stock market.  This ratio is 1.618.  This reciprical is 0.618.  If this level is so important why is 50% used so often instead?  Below is an attempt to explain "50%" in the world of 61.8%.

Below is a typical range from 0 to 100, with the 61.8% level indicated. 

 

If you take 61.8% of the range from 61.8% to 0, you get 38.2% (which is another common fib level). 

 
 
Take 61.8% of that range, you get 23.6%
 
 
 
And again, another 61.8% you get 14.6%. 
 
 
 
Once you've determined all these "61.8%" ranges (when you could keep calculating into infiniti),  take 61.8% of each of the smaller segments.  These give us the ranges indicated in red.  One of which is the not-so-talked-about 52.8% (61.8% of the range from 0.618 and 0.382).  I personally have found this level to "fit" better when looking at movements within the markets than a straight 50%.  Plus, it makes sense in keeping with the world of the "Golden Mean".
 
 
 
As an aside, another of my personal favorite fibonacci levels is the 0.786 level.  To get this, you take the square root of 0.618.  Nice.
 
 

Lesson

2011.03.07 A different way of using Fibonacci Retracements

7. March 2011

I've never seen the typical fibonacci retracements used this way, but I've found it to be very powerful.  The typical use of a fibonacci retracement is to take a measurement of an existing move's high and low and look for percentages of that move.  Instead, look at the move SO FAR and determine how it "fits" within a larger set of fib levels.  Then, use this to determine where the next support and resistance levels could be in the future.  Think of it as price climbing up or down a ladder.

OIL Daily - The following series of charts is of OIL on the daily.  This may not be the best example, since the recent move was parabolic, but regardless, it's interesting to see it still move technically.  Back on 2/18, if you thought OIL was going to go up, you could throw the following fib levels on the chart.  All I did is select the bottom of the move and make the bars "fit" neatly within the fib levels.  In this example, the 2/18 fit nicely within the 52.8% and 78.6% levels.  There is nothing special about 25.34 other than it was where the levels seem to fit so far in the move.

 
 
Fast forward to the next day and you can see we already broke out the top of our fibs.  So, we just redraw.  I've found a good starting place is to extend the fib levels so the 61.8% level is where the 38.2% level was.  In this case, stretch the levels so 61.8% is at 24.48 (shown in the next chart).
 
 
 
As described above, the fibs were stretched so the 61.8 level is at 24.48.  Now, we have levels above as potential resistance/support levels (i.e. 25.86, 26.18, 26.71, etc)
 
 
Here is the chart just one day later.  OIL hit that 26.71 and pulled back.  Interesting.
 
 
 
So, we stretch the fib levels once again; doing the same thing as above, where we stretch the levels so the 61.8% level is where the 38.2% level was.  In this case 25.33.  This gave us even more support/resistance levels to watch for.  Below is the current chart, all the way to today's price action.  You can see how yesterday's action fit very nicely between the 14.6% level and the 23.6% level.  Did we come back down today to retest the 14.6% level before going higher?
 
 
 
OIL Weekly - I've found this technique works on all time frames.  Here is the OIL weekly chart.  I pulled the fibs from the major low we had back at the beginning of 2009 and stretched it to make the fib levels "fit", which is highlighted by the blue arrows.  Will we make it up to 30.24?
 

Lesson

2011.02.21 Unit of Movement (Part 3)

21. February 2011

Today was a truncated session due to President's Day, but that doesn't mean we didn't see some interesting movement.  Using the same levels as described in Part 2, below was today's chart.  After bouncing around in the levels in the 1337-1342 range, the bottom fell out.  As you can see, there was a big gap in support levels, so it's not surprising that once 1337 gave way, we had a lot of room to fall.  The blue arrows show areas of support and resistance.

UPDATE:  Soon after the market opened at 5pm CST, the market hit that 1327 area. 

Lesson

02.18.2011 Unit of Movement (Part 2)

18. February 2011

Continuing with the idea of looking at confluence between certain "units of movement", the chart below was made at the close of yesterday (close of 2/17 for 2/18 trading).  I set my script to use "tomorrow's" HLC, and PP based on the day that just concluded (for 2/18 day's trading).  This gave the following levels (red lines).  My thought was if we got down to the 1334-1335 area, it could mean a long up to the 1342-1343 area (indicated by the long blue arrow).  If we got extra bullish, perhaps up to 1345.  Otherwise, if we got below 1328, it could mean a pretty painful day (red arrow).

 

 

 

The chart below show the same levels as above, but with today's price action filled in.  As you can see, we came very close to that 1334-1335 area and made it up to the 1342-1343 area (see blue arrows).  If we had more day, it looks like it wanted 1344-1346.  Interesting. 

 

Here is another view looking specificly at the range from yesterday's High to Close (red arrows).  As you can see, the movement went from a low at -1 unit, then up to +1 unit, then back to center (and more).  Interesting. 

 
 
 
Okay, so what about Monday?  We now know Friday's (today's) HLC and PP, so what are the levels for the next trading day?  So glad you asked. The red levels shown below are the levels generated by our "Unit of Movement" script.  What does this tell us?  For one, Monday is President's Day and will be a half day for the ES anyway.  Thus, it will most likely be choppy and sideways.  So, I wouldn't be surprised to see it just chop around in that messy 1341-1346 range where all those red lines are.  Coincidently, Monday's R1 will be at 1345.25, right in the thick of things.  Since, R1 is near the top of that range of red lines, it may provide a short scalp.  We shall see.  Speaking of the Mid-1340's; It may be an important area to watch
 
 

Lesson

2011.02.18 Unit of Movement

18. February 2011

I've been playing with the idea that the market moves using a particular "unit of movement", which changes each day.  Some days it seems looking at the range from the Previous High to the Previous Close, then drawing lines using that range often gives support and resistance levels.  Sometimes it's the Pivot Point and the Close, or perhaps the entire High to Low range.

So, to help in this analysis, I built a tool.  The chart below is yesterday's (2/17/2011) ES, 15 minute chart.  The light blue background is overnight trading.  You can see the range from the previous day's High to Close by looking at the red arrows.  Using this "unit of movement", I draw additional lines, which are all the blue levels.  Half-units are the thin lines.  All the small, blue arrows show areas of interest where there was support and resistance from these levels.

You can see the buttons on the bottom of the chart, where I can easily change which levels are drawn.  In this case you can see the "H" and the "C" are highlighted, showing that the levels are using the High and Close range.  (scroll down...) 

 

So, this is dandy and all, but we have computers to allow us to do more.  So, I took it one step further and had the script calculate all levels for all combinations of selections (H-L, H-C, H-PP, L-C, L-PP, etc), then had it look for overlaping levels.  This still produced a lot of levels, I had it trim down a couple more times and came up with the chart below (same day, same chart).  The red lines are the levels with the most overlapping levels using the method desribed above.  Interesting! (scroll down...)

 

 
 
One of the things I am focusing the most on recently is "forward-looking" indicators and not lagging (most common indicators are "lagging", such as MA's, MACD's, Stochastics, etc).  So, one of the great things about this technique is, as soon as the market closes, you know the previous day's HLC and PP, etc.  Thus, you can generate these types of levels for the next day's trading (much like pivot points).  Interesting...
 
Good hunting, traders!
 
 
 
 
 
 

Lesson

Euro Setup Example (Daily)

24. March 2010

6E Daily: This setup has already occurred, but it was a very technical setup that is worth noting. Using symmetry, the previous pullback gave us a very accurate prediction of where the next pullback may go.  Both blue arrows are the same length.  Also, the AGET stochastic setup was also perfect (red arrow).

 
 
As for a target, a potential target is the 127.2% level as shown below.  You can also see that the stochastic is now as oversold (red arrow).  So far today, we came 3T from that 1.3329 target.
 
 
 

Lesson

Market Setup Example, 2009.10.08

8. October 2009

ES 1597T: The ES got a jolt of adrenaline after hours due to Alcoa earnings.  Using the rules posted in the last post, we are forced to look at a higher time frame due to this spike in price action.  The right, blue arrow shows an extension (161.8%) of the left blue arrow (rule #1).  Using the first pullback off the previous swing high, we get an idea of where price will pull back too for the next move higher.  These are the two red arrows.  See next chart for a closer look at this movement. (FYI, the light blue areas are overnight trading.  Thus, this chart shows two days of price action.)

 

Below is a closer look at the price action and how that little movement (from two days ago!) gave a window to how far the initial pullback could be off this high (red arrow).  As you can see, it was perfect, to the tick.  Then, there was a rally to a double top, then a sell off in the direction of the gap fill.  Typically, we would expect a higher high, but due to the time of day (8:30am EST) and the typical gravitation toward the gap (1053.25 in this case), it is not surprising to see a sell off.  Also, 1065.75 lines up with the 9/29/2009 high, so that also adds confluence.

 
 
 
 

Lesson

Market Setups and Trading Rules, 2009.10.07

7. October 2009

ES 987T: In order to learn from a choppy market and give examples of what to look for, below is a blow-by-blow look of Wednesday's trading day.  We never expect that trading will be perfect, but it's still useful to see how we could have known where a move would end and where a reversal could begin.

Here are the rules used in the series of charts below: 

 1. Use 1.272 Fibonacci extensions to determine higher high or lower low targets.  In a fast moving market, look to the 1.618 level.  When the 1.618 level is exceeded, then look at higher time and/or a larger pullback. 

 2. Once this target is hit, use the initial move off the previous swing high/low to determine pullback amount (a 1:1 move).  Once this target is hit, repeat rule #1 to find next target.

 3a. Before rule #1's target is hit, use intra-wave pullbacks to give insight into more precise targets (ABC movements, where wave A=C).  

 3b. If C is not near the 1.272 target (rule #1) and is not a new high/low, then use wave B as a guide for interim pullbacks till target hit.

 4. Use breaks of previous swing levels to change bias.

* Note, rules are based purely on price action and don't use ANY indicators!

 

Chart #1: At the close of Tuesday, we had a lower low and an expectation that it could keep going lower after hours.  Using a 1.272 fib ext we have a potential target to watch (rule #1). 

 

Chart #2:  Instead of an immediate fall, we had a small rally prior.  This rally didn't break the 1051.25 swing high, so we still expect lower lows.  Using this new info, we use a 1:1 fib projection to get a more specific target (both blue arrows are equal length).  This is rule #3a (from above).  This target is close to out original target at 1047 and is a new low. (FYI, The light blue area is overnight trading) 
 
 
 
Chart #3:  After hitting this 1047.50 target, we rallied hard and broke above the recent swing highs.  This changes our bias to "long" (rule #4).
 
 

Chart #4:  Using the same fib projection technique we get the 1.272 level at 1053.75/1054 (rule #1), which price went right to and bounced off.  If this fall goes below 1047.50, we need to flip our bias to short.  Otherwise, we try to look to see where a pullback may land in order to go higher (see Chart #5).
 
 
 
Chart #5:  History repeats itself, so previous market action can be very telling (rule #2).  We are at a new swing high, so we want to look at the previous swing high to give us an indication of how far the pullback could be.  In other words, a repeat of what happened previously.  Both blue arrows are of equal length. 
 
 
 
Chart #6: If we went long off that pullback, where is our target?  Using the same 1.272 fib extension technique (rule #1), we have a target at 1055/1055.25.  In this case we came to 1054.75 and just missed our target by 1-2T.  This is a first sign of the mood changing.  However, this is just something to keep in the back of your mind and not something definite.
 
 
 
Chart #7: We have a new high and a pullback, so we want to have an idea of where the pullback could go (rule #2).  Looking at the previous swing high, we look at the initial move down as a clue (just like in Chart #5 above).  Both blue arrows are of equal size.  Again, very close to the target of 1051, short a tick. 
 
 
 
Chart #8: Once again, we take a 1.272 fib extension (rule #1) to see a potential target at 1055.75.  Market failed to even reach the previous high and had a very choppy move up to boot.  This is another sign of weakness and if long, may be good to keep stops tight.
 
 
Chart #9: As expected, this weak movement did cause a sell off.  Being that two previous swing lows were broken (two red lines)(rule #4), we have to look at the entire move to search for a target (rule #1).  Unfortunately, this move down didn't have decent pullbacks to enter on, but we can still look for targets.  In this case, it's the 1.272 fib ext at 1045.50. 
 
 
 
Chart #10: Due to the time of day (8:00-9:00 am EST) and the expectation of a gap fill (1050.75), this 1045.50 would be a great place to go long on.  The gap fill is our initial target, but we let price action give us clues into more precise targets as it unfolds. 
 
 
Chart #11: Since we have a new low and want to get an idea of an initial target of a pullback, we use the same technique as in Chart #5 and Chart #7 (rule #2).  This technique looks as the initial move off the previous swing low, expecting history to repeat itself.  This gives us a target at 1051.75 (the two blue arrows are equal length). 
 
 
 
Chart #12:  Amazing!  The open market opens and the gap is filled and the target is hit almost exactly!
 
 
 
Chart #13: Once again, we are getting lower lows and lower highs, so we look for a target using the 1.272 fib extension (1043.50) (rule #1).
 
 
 
Chart #14: As the fall is taking place, we look to the first significant pullback to give us a more precise target (rule #3).  In this case around 1045.25 (which matches up with previous lows).  Keep in mind, this falls short of our 1043.50 target, but is just something to keep in mind.  This 1045.25 target failed to get hit as well as the lower low target!  A trailing stop would've been hit and you'd be out, but still a successful trade if short from the 1052 area. 
 
 
 
Chart #15: The previous swing high was broken, so the bias switches to "long".  Using the 1:1 technique (rule #3), we have an initial target at 1050.50.  Being that this target is not a higher high, we can look for another pullback to then go even higher (rule #3b). (See chart #17 below to see the full target using rule #1)
 
 
 
Chart #16:  Using the first pullback as a guide, we have a target of the pullback at 1048.75 to then take us higher (rule #3b).
 
 
 
Chart #17: However, before we enter in the trade, we want to have an idea of the target.  Once again, using the 1.272 fib ext, we have a target at 1053.50 rule #1).
 
 
 
 
Chart #18:  This 1048.75 was a good level, but it took awhile for price to make its move higher... coming a tick away from the target.
 
 
 
Chart #19:  Since we have a new high, we look to the last pivot high and the initial move off that high for our target (same as Chart #5, #7, #11) (rule #2).
 
 
 
Chart #20:  Target hit!
 
 
 
Chart #21: If you reversed at this 1048.75 level, you would get a little heartburn and even a retest of the level.  However, using the same ol' 1.272 fib ext technique (rule #1), the target was hit!
 
 
 
Chart #22: We have a new high, so we look at the initial move off the previous swing high (rule #2).  In this case, there is no clear "initial move" as it was a quick move down with no clear pullbacks.  Thus, we are forced to use the whole move as a target with hope that the move down will give us indication of target. 
 
 
 
Chart #23: Using rule #3, a small pullback on the way down gave us a 1:1 fib extension move down to 1048.25 (two red arrows).  This is just below the 1049.25 target mentioned above.  But is NOT below the previous swing low at 1048 and is more like a double bottom.  This would be a good place to take profit and go flat.
 
 
 
Chart #24:  As mentioned above, this new target was NOT a new low, so we have no choice but to expect new lows until the downtrend fails.  A new low below 1048.50 happened, so the down trend is still valid.
 
 
 
Chart #25: So, what do we do when we get a new high/low? We use rule #2 to see what kind of pullback to expect, then use rule #1 to give a target.
 
 
 
Chart #26:  We got a double bottom (1047.50), then a rally that would've triggered a trailing stop.  However, this break higher switches the bias to "long" and can expect a move to previous highs..
 
 
 
Chart #27: Since we had a bias change, we look for an entry long.  Using the first pullback as a guide (rule #3b), we have an entry at 1050 (two red arrows).  Since this pullback is so small (6 ticks), seeing a move to the 1.272 level (1049.50) isn't surprising.  Also, this 1049.50 lines up well with a 50% retracement of this rally, which is also a heads up.  Finally, using rule #1 we have a target at 1052.50/1052.75 (blue arrows).
 
 
Chart #28:  With a little heart burn during the trade and a return to the entry level, we hit our target (1052.50) and more.  Using rule #3, we also have a target at 1053.75, which was also hit.
 
 
Chart #29:  Zooming out a bit, we see that this high is very close to the high at 1054.50 from earlier in the day.  Assuming we hit new highs, using rule #1, we have a target at 1056.50.  However, we are at the end of the day, so it is something to watch in after hours trading. 
 
 
 
UPDATE:  Chart #30: Target hit and more! It went to the 1.618 level to the tick.  Using rule #2, we have a pull back target at 1055. (FYI, the overnight session has begun, thus the light blue background has begun displaying.  The vertical, light gray line denotes the beginning.)
 

Lesson

History Repeating Itself, 2009.09.06

6. September 2009

ES Daily: As mentioned in past posts, sometimes history repeats itself (but in a more compact or expanded way).  In the chart below, the two circled areas look very similar, 'eh?  Even when looking closely at the minor peaks, there is a lot of similarities.  Plus, both look like a head and shoulders pattern.  Does this give a possible window into next week?

It's been said that the week or few days leading up to a major holiday is typically counter the trend the market is in.  In this case, we rallied the last past of last week before the Labor Day weekend.  Does this mean a fall the beginning of next week?  This is in line with day following the circled area!

Good hunting traders! 

 
 
 

Lesson

Couple Quick ES Charts...

30. August 2009

ES 610T: One of my favorite fib ratios is the 1.272 fib extension.  To illustrate how often we see this ratio, see the charts below.  When the market opened Sunday afternoon, we gapped down and hit the 1.272 fib extension exactly (see arrows and levels).

 

After this level was hit, we filled the gap and hit the 1.272 fib extension of the above mentioned move down.  Then another reversal to the downside.

 
 
UPDATE: Thanks to D. Choi:  Then later on, another...  
 
 
 
 

Lesson

Gap Fill Setup, 2009.08.11

11. August 2009

ES 987T: Just a couple quick charts showing the movement around the Gap Fill play.  There wasn't much of a gap to fill in the first place, however.

Prior to the gap fill entry, we had a pop off the 1.272 fib extension... right into our 8:30am EST financial news.  In this case, Productivity and Costs.

 

The actual entry was using the 1.272 fib extension (shown below) to 1008.  Front-running by a tick may have gotten you a perfect fill.  1007.75 was also yesterday's high.  This setup gave you a quick 3 points! 

 

 
Technically, it's not a gap until the open market opens at 9:30am EST (which is in 30min of this writing).  So, at this point we can't call the gap "filled", per say. The next possible pullback for an entry could be at this 1009.25 area.  This is the 0.786 retracement of this down leg and the 1.618 fib extension of the movement mentioned in the last chart.
 
 

Lesson

Gap Fill Setup, 2009.08.10

10. August 2009

ES 987T:  The "Gap Fill" play is a high percentage play, though entry is sometimes difficult.  The best scenario is that the market will trend in one direction over night, then it will be a counter-trend play into the gap fill.  The gap fill's target is the previous day's 4:00pm close.  In this case, it was Friday's 4:00pm close (8/7) at 1007.25 (big red line on the charts below).  

Note: It is recommended to front-run entries and targets by a tick or two to make sure you're filled.  It is also critical that certain other rules be followed to make sure that a gap fill is likely and one should even look for an entry in the first place.  For starters, making sure the YM is not gapping too much (90-100 is too much) and we are in a high potential gap zone and checking win rate for that gap zone (checking the seasonality win percentages of the trade is a good practice too).  Another great resource is the eminiaddict.com rules on "Gap Fade Setups".

Here is today's setup and what points us to a good, long entry to hit the gap fill at 1007.25.  The light blue area is the overnight movement.

The second blue arrow is 127.2% of the first blue arrow.  Perfect entry at 1000.50. 

 
 
On a micro level, the right blue arrow is 127.2% of the left blue arrow.  Very good entry at 1001. After regular trading began at 9:30am EST, there was a retest of this level and a second opportunity to enter here.
 
 
 
On the previous micro pullback, we see the right blue arrow is 161.8% of the left blue arrow.  This level overlaps with the level from the previous chart (off a tick), which makes it a stronger support.  This also would've given a good entry at 1001.25.  You can see the 127.2% level gave a good pop before and after the optimal entry level. 
 
 
 
Next to the 1.272 fibonacci extension, one of my favorite fib levels is the 0.786.  After regular trading began at 9:30am EST, there was a micro retracement to the 0.786 level and another opportunity to enter long. 
 
 
 
Good hunting traders! 
 

Lesson

Elliot Wave Example on Euro (6E) using Oscillator

4. August 2009

6E 233T: I saw this on my chart and thought it was a textbook example of sub-waves.  Below, you can see the 5 Elliot Waves form and how the oscillator reflects these waves.  (The waves on the chart are also labeled on the oscillator.)  After wave 5 formed, an expected large retrace happened.  On a larger scale, this 5 wave formation are just "sub-waves" of a larger "wave 3" down.  The blue arrows show the larger, 5-wave movement.  

In this case, the larger 5-wave move failed to make a lower low. You can see the great divergance on the osc as this large, Wave 5 formed.

Lesson

Market Update ($TNX), 2009.07.21

21. July 2009

$TNX Weekly:  $TNX is the 10 Year T-Note Yield.  I overlayed the S&P Index ($SPX, red line) to show the divergence that occurred at the 2007 top and the recent 2009 bottom pivot.  As you can see below, the 10yr topped 3 months prior to when the $SPX topped in October.  Similarly, the 10yr bottomed 3 months prior to the $SPX bottoming in March.  Perhaps this type of movement can give us some visability in the future?

It is interesting to see the $TNX follow fibonacci levels just like everything else.  By taking an extension of the "wave 1" off of "wave 2" we have a reaction at the 1.382 level and the 2.618 levels.

Lesson

Market Update (NQ), 2009.07.20

20. July 2009

Weekly NQ: W2 is approximately 0.618 of W1.  W3 is exactly 1.786 of W1.  We are currently at a 50% retracement of W3.  On to new lows from here?  If so, target of 773 (as shown below). 

Also note that the 0.618 retracement level lines up with the bottom of W1.

Lesson

Bonds (ZB) Update, 2009.07.17

17. July 2009

ZB Daily:  Interesting movement in bonds this week.  The movement seems to pointing to new lows in the future.  W4 came just short of the 1.618 resistance, which was also a .382 retracement of W3.

The chart shows the daily movement from the beginning on 2009.  I circled the first touches of each important extension of W1 (1.272, 1.618, and 2.618).  Each had a reaction.

Lesson

Market Update, 2009.07.13

13. July 2009

ES Daily:  Below illustrates a possible bullish scenario that we are seeing on the daily ES.  For a moment, ignore the area that is circled in the lower left of the chart (X Wave) and assume Elliot Wave 1 begins at 761.50 (as demonstrated by the first blue arrow).  W2 makes a perfect 0.786 retracement of W1.  The length of W3 is exactly 2.618 of W1.  W4 has made a perfect 50% retracement of W3.  So far, very textbook Elliot Wave movement.  This would imply a projection of W5 to go to the levels shown in the chart below. 

Lesson

Market Update, 2009.07.07

7. July 2009

ES Daily: Nice H&S formed in the ES.  Today's low hit the bottom of the neckline to the tick (5/18 low of 875.25)!  Time for the neckline to break. 

 

If we are starting the larger Elliot Wave 5 down, then this could be the beginning of it.  Wave 5 has five sub-waves.  If this is the case, we have witnessed wave 1 and wave 2 (nice 50%-61.8% ret of Wave 1) and are beginning wave 3.  Some Wave 3 targets are below.

 

The bullish argument is that the recent pullback is merely the Wave 4 of the the five waves up.  If so (assuming we rise from here), some targets of Wave 5 is 1055 to 1167.  See below. 


 
Also note that this 1055 area also cooresponds with the 50% retracement of "wave 3" (on the ES Weekly), as shown below.
 
 
 

Lesson

Market Update, 2009.07.05

5. July 2009

SPY Weekly: Taking a step back and looking at the movement of the market since the beginning in October 2007, it looks so clear!  That's very easy to say after the fact, of course.  From an Elliot Wave standpoint, the movement was very textbook.

Around the middle of May 2008,  we made a 50%-61.8% retracement of "wave 1" to make "wave 2", then quickly started the next wave down. See below.

 
 
The next wave down, "wave 3" is typically 161.8% to 261.8% of "wave 1".  You can see we fell right in that range (between the two red lines), very close to the 261.8% level. There was also signs of divergence in the oscillator as we reached this low in March 2009.  This is a sign of the end of "wave 3".  See below. 
 
 
 
The "wave 4" pullback is typically 38.2% to 50% of "wave 3".  You can see below that we made a perfect 38.2% pullback in June 2009.  Also, at this point, we have a false bar setup with the bias down and the stochastic in the overbought area.  See below.
 
 
 
Using the fibonacci time tool, the end of "wave 4" typically ends at 138.2% of "wave 2".  If we have indeed seen the near-term top, this was very accurate.  See below. 
 
 
 
Looking forward, "wave 5" is typically 61.8% to 100% of the bottom of wave 1 to the bottom of wave 3.  This would put targets at 60 and 37!  The 60 level also cooresponds to the MOB  (green bar).  By definition, "wave 3" is the longest wave, so if wave 5 goes longer than wave 3, then this entire move will be relabeled "wave 3".
 
Putting the SPY at 37 seems a bit unrealistic.  However, ~60 seems reasonable. Keep in mind, if "wave 4" pulls back further, this would also pull these targets higher with it.  In other words, if the SPY pulls back to the 50% level (around 105), then the 61.8% level would go from 60 up to around 68-70. 
 
 
 
QQQQ Weekly: The SPY pulling back only to the 38.2% level seems small, however, looking to the NASDAQ (QQQQ), we see a better picture.  The NASDAQ has proven to be the leader of the S&P and the price action below seems to confirm it.  The Q's pulled back almost 50% of its "wave 3".  The "wave 5" projection puts a target near 21.  See below. 
 
 
 

Lesson

Market Update, 2009.06.15

15. June 2009

ES Daily:  As the chart below illustrates, we are still within the fork (even though we are hitting the bottom of it), we are still above the 200 MA (light blue line), and we bounced off a 50% retracement (917) measured from a recent low.  The 34 MA (purple line) is crossing the 200 MA, which may prove interesting in the next couple sessions.

I would love to say the trend is changing, but it's just not proven yet.  I'd like to see that 0.618 level fail, a close below the 200MA, and a close below the fork to really help the bear argument.

 
 
On the bearish front, we are bouncing off the 50% retracement below shown below. 
 

Lesson

Market Update, 2009.06.11

11. June 2009

ES Daily:  Still no close above 1/6/2009 high (942.75) and five (!) doji days in a row!  Same question:  Bull flag or trend change? 

 

With so many doji's, we must ask, why the indecision?  Perhaps it is due to the 50% level we are hitting in the chart below?  (With a target of 526.50!)

Lesson

Market Update, 2009.06.10

10. June 2009

ES Daily:  I'm not a big follower of candlestick formation anaylsis, but four (4) doji stars in a row must mean something.  If nothing else, great indecision.  In other words, Friday through Wednesday each had a candlestick body where the close was very close (if not the same) as the open (see circled area).  

We are also still within the fork and still being contained between 1/6/09 high and the  5/7/09 high.  Is this tight range a bull flag?  Or, are we seeing doji stars before a trend change?  I'm looking for a close above 942.75 or a close below the bottom of the fork to give some insight into which direction.

Remember Thursday is contract rollover day. 

Lesson

Market Update, 2009.06.03

3. June 2009

Weekly ES:  Below is a weekly ES chart with a fork that seems to contain the move very well.  The top, left peak is the Oct 2007 highs.  The gray lines are 1.382 extension of the fork.  You can see, we are currently at the top of this fork. 
 
 
 
Weekly ES:  This isn't the most precise of trendlines, but interesting none-the-less.
 

 
 
Daily ES:  Zooming down to the daily ES, we have been following another fork very closely for weeks.  The fork from the weekly is still on this cart.  As you can see, on 6/2, we bounced off where the gray, "1.382" line and the current fork meet.  We also closed above the 200 SMA (bullish sign), then retested it today (6/3).  The fact we tested it (almost exactly) and bounced, is another bullish sign.
 
 
 
Daily ES:  Zooming in a bit closer (still daily chart), we see that the current wave up (right arrow) reacted at the 1.272 fib extension level of the previous wave down (left arrow).  I find this pattern happens very often with the ES.  In particular, on the 987T chart. 
 
 
 
Weekly NQ:  Looking at the weekly NQ, we use a fork using the same three points as with the ES except we put the fork in "modified" mode, which puts the start of the median line 50% down from the peak.  You can see we are revisiting that median line now, right at the 1.272 extension.  This is also the 10/13/2008 high.  Resistance from here?

 
 
 

 
 

Lesson

Interesting Fibonacci Extension, 2009.05.29

31. May 2009

I often like to look at past moves to predict future moves.  On Friday, we had a choppy sideways movement, followed by a late afternoon rally.  The rally we had in the afternoon (right blue arrow) was exactly 2.618x (261.8%) of the rally we had in the morning (left blue arrow).  To the tick!  Also, notice the reaction around the 1.0 and 0.786 levels and a close near the 1.618 level.

Lesson

Minute Chart versus a Tick Chart

31. May 2009

I wanted to give a quick example of why I use tick charts as my primary chart over a chart that uses time.

Friday had a wild close and seemed to really exemplify why I rely heavily on tick charts.  Below is a 5-minute chart which shows the huge run up and then some chop into the close (circled area). 

 
 
Below is a 987T chart of the same data as above, which shows the run up and the movement into the close.  This means every bar contains 987 trades.  Thus, higher volume will cause the bars to form quicker.  On the flip side, low volume will take much more time to form.  Using a tick chart instead of a time-based chart allows you to more clearly see the structure of movement.  I am a firm believer in fibonacci ratios and series, so I use various tick charts from the fibonacci series, in this case 987.  To see larger moves, I like the 1598T charts.
 
 
Another great example is overnight trading, where volume is light and it takes a lot of time to see a move unfold.  If you remove time from the equation, the movement is much simplier to see.  In the example below, the light blue area is the overnight trading.  The waves move seamlessly from the overnight trading into the normal trading hours. See next chart for this same data in a 15min chart.
 
 
Below is a 15-min chart of the same data.  You can see the overnight data is very stretched out compared to normal trading hours.  This makes it difficult to see the structure of the waves and movement as opposed to the chart above. 
 
 
This doesn't mean I don't use minute-based charts as well.  When trying to see the larger picture of what the market is doing, 15 minute charts, 240 minute charts, daily charts, weekly charts, etc are also extremely valuable.
 
 
 
 
 
 

Lesson

Homework for Wednesday 2009.05.27 and fib lesson

27. May 2009

 

Last night's prediction was right on.  See last post

Notes for Wednesday: 

  • If price gets that high, expect resistance at 922 (Gann level) to 923.50 (5/20 high), then 936.25 (1.272 fib extension of last move down, see Chart #2).  However, I feel 914 area might be it.  See chart #1 and #2 below.
  • Take note of the larger 50% retracement at 895.50 (target of 922.75).
  • Support:  24H PP at 898.75.  PIT PP at 888.25.

 

CHART #1: Below is a daily chart of the ES and I'm looking at the two movements/waves indicated by the blue arrows.  As you can see, this latest wave is 0.786 or 78.6% of the last wave (fib level).  The flip side of this is if our current wave extended higher than the last wave.  See Chart #2 below.


 
CHART #2:   If we extended higher than the last wave, the level we would look at would be 1.272 or 127.2% of the last wave.  That chart would look something like the one below.  Nothing in trading is 100%, but this type of ratio happens over and over in the market, so it pays to be prepared.  See Chart #3 below for another example.
 
 
 
CHART #3: To illustrate this fib ratio even further, below is another daily chart, showing the last two waves and their their relationship.  You can see that the right, blue arrow is 127.2% of the left, blue arrow... pretty much to the tick! 
 
 
 
CHART #4: We are currently range bound as dictated by those last pivot highs (see arrows).
 
 
 
 

Homework, Lesson